The Hateful Eight

So it's that time of year again. Time for family, holidays, good food and presents. However, it's also time for some interesting movies. Now everyone's been clamoring about the new Star Wars, but personally, I have my eyes set on a different movie. The Hateful Eight is the, coincidently or not, eighth movie from famous director Quentin Tarantino. He's made some of the most commercially and critically successful movies ever, such as Pulp Fiction, Inglorious Basterds, and most recently, Django Unchained. He has been known for his sharp writing, over the top violence and meticulous attention to detail that's garnered him such a loving following over the years.

The movie, set to star actors like Samuel L. Jackson, Walter Goggins, Tim Roth among others. Many faces in the cast will look familiar to people who have seen a Tarantino film before. Anyway, the movie is about eight different people who, against their will, get trapped in a building and have to spend a few nights with each other, and this isn't any happy sleepover. No one trusts anyone and tensions are bound to be high.

One choice Tarantino made for the film which is really interesting is he made the decision to shoot using 70mm film, which isn't seen too often these days, and is certainly worth checking out one of the 70mm versions, because it will contain 6 addition minutes of film as well as usage of different takes. The total run time for the 70mm version is 3 hours and 2 minutes, and it's likely jam packed with everything that makes his movies so enjoyable. The movie releases on Christmas day, and I recommend making plans to go see, not necessarily on Christmas. And don't forget to go with someone you trust.

'The Human Centipede' and 'Snakes on a Plane': Creating Crap Gets You the Big Money

I was recently listening to some of comedian Patton Oswalt's stand up comedy routines and one of his bits got me thinking. The bit was about a movie called Death Bed: The Bed That Eats that he had recently heard of that got sold and was being released on DVD. He went onto described what a terrible premise for a movie this was and lamented the fact that the writers of it actually got money for writing it. This got me thinking about the recent slew of crappy movies that have actually made money from being crappy. The two examples that came to mind were The Human Centipede (First Sequence) and Snakes on a Plane.

A quick overview of these movies.

Dieter Laser as the mental unbalanced Dr. Heiter.

The Human Centipede is, according to its IMDB page, about "a mad scientist [who] kidnaps and mutilates a trio of tourists in order to reassemble them into a new 'pet'-- a human centipede, created by stitching their mouths to each others' rectums." The movie is filled with the terribly acted stereotypical characters (the crazy surgeon, the inarticulate foreigner, the hopelessly dumb young girl) that you usually find in the horror genre. Occasionally, there are a few interesting shot choices and fluid transitions, but mainly it is generically filmed. The worst part of the film, however, is the writing. Expected dialogue and boring plot twists abound.

Samuel L. Jackson as Neville Flynn.

Snakes on a Plane is not very different, with the exception of the always excellent Samuel L. Jackson filling the main role. Its title also spells out the entire plot of the movie.

Tom Six, director/creator of The Human Centipede, is not credited with making anything else of note, but the director of Snakes on a Plane, David R. Ellis, is the director of such unappealing classics like Cellular and Final Destination 2. Clearly neither have much of a track record, but there is one thing separating them from all of the other run-of-the-mill filmmakers out there: money.

The shocking thing about these two films is that regardless of the mediocre production value, the even more mediocre acting, and the altogether horrible writing, they actually managed to make money. The Human Centipede has made about $2.3 million, while Snakes on a Plane has made over $85 million. These movies have made this money purely on the shock value that their titles and central gimmicks have produced.

As young filmmakers trying to break into the business one way or another, these films provide at least a minimal amount of inspiration. With a fair amount of connections and an original gimmick for a movie, you, too, can earn back enough cash to produce something worth while the next time.

--------------------

Here is the Patton Oswalt clip, but be warned: it's got some pretty highly offensive language in it. It may not be suitable for everyone.